我可以說中國國民黨之所以軟弱就是婆婆媽媽的心態太多了,面對戰爭必須是冷酷無情的,用婆婆媽媽的心態是不可能統一中國的。
今天要是俄羅斯輸了烏克蘭戰爭,我可以跟您說台獨會得到更多人支持。為何俄羅斯打輸,台獨會得到更多支持?
首先是戰場地形,俄羅斯跟烏克蘭是陸地連陸地,中國大陸與台灣是隔著一個海峽,要是俄羅斯連陸地連陸地都會打輸的話,那台獨份子就不會怕武統了,因為他們會相信與中國大陸熱戰一定會勝利。因此要統一中國就別談那些婆婆媽媽的道德問題,要馬基維利主義一點,惡名昭彰的《君主論》是馬基維利當年要統一義大利所寫的書,統一中國也必然是如此。
所謂的戰犯是戰敗者的問題。美國人曾經說,要是太平洋戰爭我們打輸,那我們就是對日本投射燒夷彈的戰犯,所以不管怎樣我們都必須打贏,即使是用毀滅性武器也要打贏。打贏是政治問題,如果軍事上沒打贏,那麼政治上的問題就沒有甚麼意義,所以要的就是打贏,打贏就是對的,不要說那麼多道理,特別是甚麼國際法。必須打贏,就算用毀滅性武器也必須打贏,打輸甚麼大道理都沒有用,戰犯就是戰犯,打贏就算使用毀滅性武器也是英雄。
不管怎樣,俄羅斯的戰爭勝利才有益於台海的和平統一,因為俄羅斯對烏克蘭的戰爭勝利,特別是用沙皇炸彈獲得戰爭勝利,這樣會讓許多人怯戰。我要的就是你們怯戰,如果要再戰,再投擲一次沙皇炸彈。

To the author: you’ve very clearly lost your mind. So you’re actually encouraging the use of weapons of mass destruction. This is so incredibly bonkers that I don’t even know how anyone can take this seriously. So after Ukraine is nuked, and turned into a nuclear wasteland, you’re saying Taiwan’s next. This means you’re okay with there being a radioactive wasteland just several miles off the coast of China. All this just to stoke your unificationist waishengren ego.
I know this blog is a safe space for waishengren unificationist extremists, but even in view of that, this article is so crazy that I can’t understand why the editors saw fit to print it.
Here’s a thought for you: why are you carrying putin’s water? if your motherland invaded TAiwan [my country, very clearly not yours], i know for sure that putin wouldn’t even care. He’d chuckle, sit back and watch the show: look at these “Ch***s" killing themselves. You’re cheering russia on because you have a colonial mentality, and that comes from you being on this opiate called confucianism. You’re hoping that by giving russia support, when the time comes russia will support your homicidal campaign against TAiwan. Because being the confucian that you are, you’re a perpetual “student" incapable of standing on his own two feet, always on the look out for a teacher/sponsor to give you shelter and protection. In this case, russia fits the bill. To you, russia is the WHITE saviour you’ve been looking for.
Here’s a reality check: Russia has wrecked itself. It might be able to “win" in Ukraine, but given the effectiveness and, yes, the ruthlessness, of the western sanctions, in ten years, in russia, there’ll be nothing but mud, grinding poverty, sickness, and hate.
讚讚
這位黃先生的留言,其中提到『馬基維利』,更提到『沙皇炸彈』;
馬基維利給人的觀感就是很現實,不談好聽的大道理;在軍事上,本無須那些高調;然而,在當前的俄烏複雜衝突中,可能僅僅採取馬基維利的態度是不夠的;個人看來,應該還是分別對待,對於美國與北約應該是現實主義的,讓他們知難而退,但是對於同族相鄰的烏克蘭則絕對是應該儘量採取統一戰線的方式,無論對於當事人或是旁觀者,才更具有記取經驗與教訓的意義。
至於『沙皇炸彈』,個人原來不知何指,但上網查看,才知道指的竟然是毀滅性的核彈;就兩國接壤,且雙方同為俄羅斯人言,個人完全看不出有那樣的必要性;當然,在現實中似乎不能說不可能;但是,在自己領土不遠處,又有不少俄羅斯人的地方,普丁真是那麼傻且笨嗎?作者如此說法,是否可能只是顯示了自身的焦慮吧?哈,這篇文章,倒讓我想到,我的焦慮症吃藥的時間到了。
讚Liked by 1 person