管長榕先生所寫《外來本土之分無寧日》是一篇好文，讀後有感。
統獨在台灣紛擾70多年，至今未曾稍歇。說穿了，不過就是台獨日奴企圖奪取政權，硬生生想把中國人的固有領土，分裂出去，所找出來的藉口而已。
那堆搞台獨的笨圾，不惜丟棄祖宗，不認自己是中國人，搞「外來本土之分」搞「本省人外省人之分」，但真正奪取政權了，完全執政了，掌握所有資源了，看看他們哪一個敢宣佈台灣獨立？哪一個敢實現他們所謂的台獨理想？充其量他們口中崇高的台灣獨立就只是為了奪權目的所使用的一張衛生紙，擦完屁股就丟進馬桶沖掉，這群台獨日奴根本就是一群詐騙集團，每一個都是大騙子。
文中提到：『在法理上有這樣兩句話，「民族自決權的行使不得被解釋為鼓勵採取任何行動侵犯主權和獨立國家的領土完整或國家統一」。「國際法沒有立場保護魁北克領土完整而不保護加拿大領土完整，也不能接受加拿大可被分割而魁北克不可被分割的矛盾」。最後，公理在大炮射程內。』
這段話已經完全說穿了一件事，就是不管法理定義是如何如何，國際法又如何如何，一點都不算數，只有大炮說了算，大炮就是公理。
看看美國就知道了，美國哪管聯合國決議？說打伊拉克、阿富汗、利比亞…. 說打就打，哪管氣候公約？哪管國際海洋公約？哪管生物武器公約？說退出就退出，說不理就不理，怎樣？敢不服氣，就把航母開到你家門口，戰鬥機就去投彈，政權就把你推翻，就在各國搞出幾百所生化實驗室，聯合國又能奈何？世界各國又能奈何？美國的大炮就是比你大！
那堆所謂西方民主國家，想要分裂中國，支持台獨、疆獨、藏獨時在那邊高喊尊重「民族自決」「住民自決」，等到同樣「民族自決」「住民自決」發生在自己國家時，卻完全的武力陣壓，完全不給任何自決。
文章中提到西班牙的巴塞隆納、加拿大的魁北克，不是都完成了西方所謂的公投民主程序要獨立了嗎？結果咧？西班牙、加拿大政府允許了嗎？尊重民主結果了嗎？ 尊重人民的意志了嗎？還不是把帶頭的抓進監獄！現在的英國弱了，英國各聯邦紛紛要求獨立，就看他們如何尊重「民族自決」「住民自決」？同樣的，問問美國白宮，允不允許加州獨立？問問蔡英文和賴清德，台灣要不要獨立？敢不敢獨立？允不允許澎湖獨立？台北獨立？……
說穿了，西方和笨圾民進黨的兩套標準，都在打臉自己，根本禁不起檢驗。現實的世界，誰大炮大誰說了算，越共大炮比南越政府大，所以越共成功了，中國共產黨大炮比國民黨大，所以中共成功統治大陸了。在國際上也是一樣，美國處心積慮，不擇手段，想永久分裂中國，美國自知自己力量已非當年，不敢自己對付北京，所以四處揪群，想圍歐中國，問題是，現在的中國已非昔日吳下阿蒙，而美國自身早已千瘡百孔，鹿死誰手？現在還在掰手腕中。
在這個節骨眼，笨圾民進黨卻自甘當美國走狗，手臂往外彎，把中國人的台灣出賣給美國，美國要求台灣佈雷，民進黨蔡英文就要佈雷，花了人民１億多美元，連佈雷車都買了；美國要台灣人民吃萊豬，民進黨蔡英文就讓台灣人民吃萊豬，這個倒行逆施、禍國殃民的笨圾民進黨蔡英文政府，罪惡層層疊疊，罄竹難書，台灣人民一定要把這個詐騙集團、賣國集團拉下馬，否則台灣永無寧日，台灣人民無法出頭天。
奮 起 
Based on his name, I’m assuming this author is a benshengren Taiwanese, who’s clearly consumed by a deep, dark self-hatred. These two articles got it totally wrong: the point of Taiwan’s localization efforts is not primarily to hate China, it’s to love ourselves, meaning us benshengren. It’s to awaken in us love and respect for our own culture, our own language, our own politics, our own land, and above all, our own people. Maybe waishengren don’t feel included but that’s alright. Waisheng Chinese are not, afterall, the center of the universe; they don’t always need to be included, just like benshengren aren’t really included in KMT politicking. To me, localization is a labor of love. If you see localization as something else motivated by evil motives, then I think it’s because you’ve been festering in resentment for far too long.
One of the worst things to befall Chinese society is the culture of the nonlocal/a-local confucian, civilian [as opposed to military] mandarin. This kind of person resembles what’s called a “rootless cosmopolitan", in the West. This is someone who has relinguished his cultural, linguistic and geographic roots, and to him, the only thing ever to matter in life is his career as a (roving) bureaucrat in the civil, central government. Nothing else matters, and if he has to trade in and sell out his “country", whatever “country" means to him, for bureaucratic status, he’d do that in a heartbeat. In fact, not to do so would subject him to derision from his fellow confucians. This is exactly what happened with the fall of the Ming and the advent of the manchu dahluu. When you are effectively nothing but a knot of careerism, you cease being human. The rest of us human beings have deep roots in a place, and a history, and a people. We’re not just a bureaucratic title. The elevation of the life of the confucian civilian mandarin as *the* ultimate ideal, has destroyed Chinese society. It’s made us Chinese/Taiwanese slaves, to meaningless, empty bureaucratic status-seeking.
So, Chinese “unification"… I personally wish the Chinese nation well. And if they can prosper and thrive as a unified country, then good for them. But taken to its extreme, Chinese unification is an irrational, nonsensical, ridiculous article of faith. The extreme position taken by a lot of unificationists, which is gradually becoming mainstream unfortunately, is that as long as China is “unified", it doesn’t matter who or which group does the unifying. So it’s okay to have the manchu dahluus “unify" China, according to this extreme version of unification. But this is insane. So if the japs had been able to “unify" China, the unificationists would instantly turn into jap apologists. To some extent, this already did happen – with Wang Jingwei. This insane version of unification holds no appeal for me.
I wish the authors of these two articles would be able to find goodwill for us benshengren Taiwanese. Real goodwill, that isn’t part of some cynical ploy to “buy" support for their extreme brand of unification.
讚讚